to reduce vacant through a vacancy tax rate increase housing supply

NetEase interpretation of 534 issues: collection of housing vacancy tax do not fly! NetEase finance, June 8 in recent days, Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau population of Corps announced a population graph completion, matching 3.812 million vacant housing. In the midst of controversy, Corps responded that vacant housing is not the last of the population data. Various statistical methods came to the high vacancy rate, experts suggest that levy tax on vacant reduce resource waste. Housing vacancy tax toDid mark the end of? Housing vacancy rate of the lack of rigorous data blindly undesirable housing vacancy rate tax has been a controversy, civil investigations are not reliable as early as 2010, national census has sparked a domestic discussion on housing vacancy survey. Growing citizens ' needs on the one hand, data of the National Bureau of statistics has no authority on the one hand release. 2010 in August, the Statistics Office spokesman said sheng says, Bureau of statistics is not statistics housing vacancy rate, because the House is vacant real estate development new issues that have emerged, its statistical system does not establish, vacancy rates of the quantitative standards it is difficult to determine. While in there, all kinds of estimates are emerging. Media survey of State grid Corporation of 660 cities across the country, high65.4 million sets of House electric meter readings for 6 consecutive months to zero. While national grid quickly denied, but data have been widely circulated. Later, Internet, sparking a "hundred friends tanning lamps" activities, shows, black light rate of more than 50% of many communities throughout the country. Some research group of the University housing by means of a questionnaire drawn vacancy rates at more than 30%. InDuiwaijingmaodaxue statistics teacher Yang Jianhua, hailed as the "simple" folk are lack of rigour in the survey data, to define, quantify the deviation of the vacancy rate, survey methodology is too rough, the result lacks credibility. "3.81 million units" is the unadjusted data, multi-level of the Public Security Bureau of investigation access to authoritative data and that the survey "381" vacantHousing data is just the initial data, there is no reference value. Civilian police participating in the Census explained diablo 3 power leveling, when they went to the resident family household is not, you will be zoned the House temporarily vacant homes; verification in the future when the population to determine who will be recognized as vacant rooms after separation. Thus, and many people's judgment, "3.81 million units" greatly overestimated the number of vacant homes. In order to getAuthoritative statistics, statistical agencies may wish to study abroad experience, multi-layer surveys and statistics. United States, for example, the vacancy rate data from three sources: Census Bureau census every ten years a vacancy rate of data covering and counties; Department of housing survey survey once every two years, covering 44 major cities; quarterly survey on the housing vacancy survey every time. This special survey and census synchronizationAdvance, information is more comprehensive, stereo, system, reliable, is worthy of our statistical offices try to. There is no precise statistical data do support, data analysis, policy formulation is water without a source, be like a tree without roots, policy cannot effectively track. Calls upon the introduction of a tax on vacant at this time the lack of theoretical foundations, is blind. Impose a tax on vacant lack of action, levyHigh cost of Government early in 2010 during the two sessions, some members have proposed a levy of free tax advice for housing. Guo Songhai as a member of the National Committee had submitted a report to the General Assembly in his statement on the proposed housing idle taxes before the property tax levy, property tax "practice turn" pilot. Because property taxes compared to houses of unused tax involves small, simple, and easy operation. ButIs that collection of housing vacancy tax operations is not so simple. First, vacant it is difficult to define, how long is left vacant, vacant because categories are to be considered. China Center for economic research, Peking University Professor Xu Dian Qing questioned if unoccupied vacant rooms simply defined as more than half a year, then causes due to urban renewal, or rent or sell at the market price, but not yetFind lease or purchase, and idle land developers hoarding, cover plate of the housing stock are also of vacant tax into categories? Second, determined by how empty it? Suppose we finalize "6 months no one lives" for the vacant, investigators are how many frequent visits to verify empty? Visit frequently, and takes a lot of human and financial resources; less frequently, evenSo much of it. With electricity, water, gas, as standards are not scientific, avoidance of a large space. Economist Steven z. f. Xue questioned: "some real estate, is being bought investment, no one lived. If you impose a tax on vacant, and owners can live? A pool, you can ' live ' cycle of several building--to turn on the light to turn off the lights and switchTap tap. Outsiders how to tell if a House does anyone live? How many people live in? Live more frequently? "This shows that a vacant tax thankless task view my site here, but rather, fat Government, does not engage in it! Vacancy tax gross interference in personal choices, also cannot change the upward trend of housing vacancy is a personal choice, not the resources wasted a general argument that, empty flats,But not one was kind of a waste of social resources, as long as the imposed a tax on vacant, "to the fair allocation of social resources." How attractive this is a gangster logic! We don't because girl's cabinet filled with clothes don't wear, collection of clothing vacant tax, not because someone hid the money under the pillow of a monetary vacant tax, or because her husband to travel to its signVacancy tax your wife; but vacant tax on other people's housing vacancy, what is truth? The so-called "waste of social resources" is specious fallacy. A respect for the property rights of the community, is a waste of resources depends on the judgement and disposition of the property owners themselves. Homeowners choice made vacant and not for sale or for rent, must have his reasons of resource allocation, outsiders are notQuestion and judgement. Also, when seemingly "unreasonable" phenomenon may be the future of "reasonable" to prepare. Shawn Xu, an economist (micro-blogging) has said: "number of newspaper reporters went to the community in the evening light, is a waste of time, because the lamp tells you the only difference between supply and demand in the period, instead of the expected supply and demand imbalances. Are likely on the contrary, higher vacancy rate for the period, indicating thatExpectations of future supply shortage more intense. "Vacant stopgap tax, does not affect the price trend of many comments people speak with precision as from exact information, to reduce vacant through a vacancy tax rate increase housing supply, control prices rising too quickly. But the vacant role of tax for tame prices are worrying. Even if the housing vacancy tax on really, as long as prices rise-expected unchanged, homeowners will not be anxiousIs on sale on the market, but will settle for the second best for rental. Rental market supply increasing, rents fell. But falling rent, it will make people give up buying rental housing reform, reducing the need to buy it? According to Professor University of Ma Yongkai, who research shows that, in our country, rents and house prices short term independent of each other, the long-term causes of changes in house prices is to rent, rentChanges do not affect the price changes. In other words, the butt of a vacant tax, even reducing the rent, nor affect the trend of house prices. India housing vacancy tax on Government since 2002, coupled with a variety of other taxes, have failed to curb the trend of rising prices. Mumbai high house prices in Shanghai today, housing prices Beijing, New Delhi. 2010 MumbaiEven into the world's top ten, per square meter on average $ 9,163. Visible, no efforts to increase the supply of housing, but want to use layers taxes inhibit price, useless or even counterproductive. Conclusion: housing vacancy of course in the back of the right of social injustice and evil shadow of corruption, but solve social injustice to prescribe, by tax on vacant such a standard blur, poor operation, againstProperty rights, ineffective policies to stabilize prices and reduce inequality, not only does not get to the root, also will go to social progress in reversing.